Late Saturday afternoon, a 21-year-old man approached a Secret Service checkpoint near 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, in Washington, D.C., pulled a weapon from his bag, and opened fire. Officers returned fire, the suspect was mortally wounded, and a bystander was injured. The White House went into a brief lockdown while President Trump was inside. No one on the protective detail or in the president’s immediate circle was hurt. 

Advertisement

This was not an isolated disturbance. It marks the latest in a series of violent incidents involving gunfire in proximity to the president. Over the past two years, Trump has faced multiple active shooter situations targeting him or his immediate surroundings — more than any modern president. From the 2024 Pennsylvania rally, where he was grazed by a bullet and a spectator was killed, to the golf course attempt later that year, through additional threats in 2025 and 2026, and now this episode outside the White House gates, the pattern is sobering.


READ MORE: Breaking Video: White House Lockdown Lifted After Shots Fired Nearby; 2 Shot, 1 Fatally

More Details on Shooting Outside White House, Including Alleged Shooter ID


Law enforcement identified the suspect as Nasire Best, who had a prior encounter with White House security in 2025. Court records show erratic behavior, including claims of being Jesus Christ during an unauthorized approach. Mental health may well have played a role, as it often does in these cases. Yet the frequency of such events around one man cannot be waved off as a coincidence or solely the product of individual illness. 

Something broader is feeding the atmosphere in which unstable people decide that targeting the president is thinkable. For years, large segments of the political and media establishment treated Trump as an existential threat rather than a political opponent. Terms like “threat to democracy” were not occasional rhetorical flourishes; they became the default setting. 

Advertisement

Even after two assassination attempts during the 2024 campaign and additional security breaches since taking office again, prominent voices on the left have shown little interest in dialing down the temperature. Instead, the rhetoric has often hardened, with increasing comfort for ideas that lean toward centralized government control, wealth redistribution on a grand scale, and skepticism of core American institutions, tendencies that echo socialist and communist approaches more than traditional liberalism.

Democrats: ‘We oppose political violence’

Also, here’s a comprehensive list of Democrat attacks against Trump:

  • 2016 incident at Dayton, Ohio rally
  • 2016 assassination attempt at Vegas
  • 2016 Reno “gun” scare
  • 2017 forklift attack attempt
  • 2018 ricin poisoning attempt
  • 2020 escort from press briefing
  • 2020 ricin poisoning attempt
  • 2024 assassination attempt in Butler
  • 2024 assassination attempt in Florida
  • 2024 security incident at Coachella
  • Assassination attempts by Iran
  • May 2025 death threat
  • August 2025 death threat
  • 2025 security lapse at Trump National Golf Club
  • 2025 Air Force One security incident
  • February 2026 Mar-a-Lago Secret Service shooting
  • March 2026 Mar-a-Lago no-fly zone violation
  • 2026 White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting
  • 2026 National Mall Secret Service shooting
  • 2026 White House Memorial Day Weekend shooting

And these are the ones we know of.

Advertisement

The absence of consistent calls for restraint from Democratic leaders and aligned media outlets has been notable.

Condemnations of the violence tend to be pro forma, rarely paired with self-reflection about how inflammatory language contributes to a climate where four serious attempts or near-attempts can occur in relatively quick succession.

Conservative outlets and figures have, predictably, highlighted the pattern. Yet the deeper point stands on the facts alone. Political violence thrives when accountability for words evaporates and when policy disagreements are cast in apocalyptic terms. 

Trump’s return to office reflected millions of Americans’ desire for stronger borders, economic pragmatism, and a rejection of elite-driven cultural experiments. Meeting that mandate with sustained demonization has real consequences. The Secret Service and law enforcement continue to do difficult, often thankless work protecting the president. 

They deserve support and resources, not second-guessing after every incident. At the same time, the country would benefit from a broader recommitment to civil discourse. Disagreement on taxes, immigration, regulation, and foreign policy is healthy. Treating political rivals as enemies to be destroyed is not. No one should have to endure repeated attempts on their life while serving in high office.

Advertisement

The latest shooting near the White House is a reminder that words matter and that failing to lower the rhetorical heat carries a cost. It is past time for those with platforms and influence, especially those on the left, to recognize that their choices shape the environment in which these tragedies unfold. America works best when we compete on ideas, not when unstable actors decide the contest must end in gunfire. 

Editor’s Note: Every single day, here at RedState, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical Left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its successes. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.