The curtain is finally falling on Stephen Colbert’s “Late Show,” and it isn’t a moment too soon for CBS’s balance sheets or for viewers exhausted by a decade of partisan lecturing. His departure on May 21st offers a moment to consider what late-night television once delivered and what much of it has become.

Advertisement

Colbert’s show often functioned as a reliable platform for one set of political viewpoints. Night after night, segments leaned heavily into progressive assumptions about current events, treating liberal perspectives as defaults and alternatives as worthy of mockery. This approach built a loyal following among viewers who shared those views. It also turned the program into something closer to an echo chamber than broad entertainment. 

When a show consistently reinforces one side’s talking points, it risks losing the wider appeal that once defined the genre.

CBS axes The Late Show with Stephen Colbert tonight — final episode at 11:35 PM ET.

Colbert led his timeslot with ~2.5 million viewers… but the show still lost $40 million+ yearly (with Colbert’s salary reportedly ~$15 million).

Meanwhile, newer shows like Gutfeld! at 10pm were regularly crushing it with 3 million+ viewers.

Late-night economics hitting hard. Smart business by CBS?

(Video: AI)

Compare that to Johnny Carson, who hosted “The Tonight Show” for 30 years. Carson understood his role. He kept his personal politics private and focused on delivering laughs that could land with a diverse audience. Viewers tuning in after a long day did not need to know where he stood on policy debates. They wanted clever monologues, engaging interviews, and the kind of humor that united rather than divided. 

Advertisement

Carson’s success was not accidental. By avoiding partisan lectures, he created a space where Americans of different backgrounds could relax and find common ground in comedy. His show thrived because it prioritized entertainment over advocacy.

Late-night television works best when it remembers its purpose. Audiences turn to these programs to unwind, not to receive another dose of the same arguments circulating on cable news or social media. The strongest hosts have historically recognized that politics is everywhere during the day. The evening hours offer a chance for something lighter and more universal. 

When shows instead double down on partisan commentary, they shrink their potential reach and contribute to the sense that nearly every institution now picks a side. Colbert’s departure isn’t occurring in a vacuum; it’s a symptom of a legacy media ecosystem in freefall.”

Cord-cutting, streaming competition, and shifting viewer habits have changed the economics of television. CBS cited ongoing losses as a factor in the decision. Yet the creative choices made over the years also matter. 

Advertisement


RELATED: Stephen Colbert Went From Sad Host to Sad Vehicle for Others’ Virtue Signaling

Comedy Gold: Sen. Kennedy Mocks Lovefest Between Fawning Late Night Host and Obama, ‘Get a Motel Room’


A format that appeals primarily to one ideological segment will struggle to justify high production costs in a fragmented media landscape. Broad entertainment draws broader audiences. Narrow messaging, however skillfully delivered, does not.

Peter Parisi’s take on the sacking of Steven Colbert – less about Colbert and more about where our culture should be. 

— Johnny Carson, who, in a 1979 interview, was asked by Mike Wallace on CBS’s “60 Minutes” why he never took on “serious controversy.”

“That’s not what I’m there for. Can’t they see that?” the GOAT of late-night TV answered. “Why do they think that just because you have ‘The Tonight Show’ that you must deal in serious issues? That’s a danger. It’s a real danger,” Carson added. “Once you start that, you start to get the self-important feeling that what you say has great import. And you know, strangely enough, you could use that show as a forum. You could sway people. And I don’t think you should, as an entertainer.”

This does not mean comedy should ignore the world. Satire has a long tradition of poking at power and human folly across the spectrum. The problem isn’t satire; it’s the ‘clapter’ trap—where satire is hollowed out and refilled with DNC press releases, served with a side of smugness. Where the same Republican targets are dehumanized nightly, while liberal failures are met with a wink and a nod. Over time, that pattern erodes trust and limits the form’s cultural impact.

Advertisement

Colbert used to show talent and commitment during his time on the air on shows like “The Dana Carvey Show” and “Strangers with Candy.” His exit, however, underscores a larger opportunity for the industry. Late-night shows can still succeed by stepping back from constant political alignment and rediscovering the joy of entertainment that welcomes more viewers instead of sorting them. 

Carson proved it is possible. The question now is whether future hosts and networks will draw the right lesson as they fill the time slot he is leaving behind.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.